<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Do Intranet Managers look through coloured glasses when judging their intranet&#8217;s impact on business?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intranet-matters.de/2009/12/04/do-intranet-managers-look-through-coloured-glasses-when-judging-their-intranets-impact-on-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intranet-matters.de/2009/12/04/do-intranet-managers-look-through-coloured-glasses-when-judging-their-intranets-impact-on-business/</link>
	<description>Next Generation Social Information, Collaboration and Communication Platforms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 14:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Stephan Schillerwein</title>
		<link>http://intranet-matters.de/2009/12/04/do-intranet-managers-look-through-coloured-glasses-when-judging-their-intranets-impact-on-business/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Schillerwein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intranet-matters.de/?p=107#comment-377</guid>
		<description>And here&#039;s the article from LinkedIn - please not that a good discussion has evolved there so make you to go there as well:

Becoming business critical seems to be a generic strategic goal for many intranets. But who is to judge whether an intranet is business critical or not?

To my knowledge there are two sources of data that look into this topic:

- The &quot;Global Intranet Trends&quot; report by Jane McConnell: here the &quot;Senior management perception&quot; as judged by the participating intranet managers is investigated

- The Worldwide Intranet Challenge (WIC): here the intranet&#039; users from the participating organisations are asked to state their perception of the intranet&#039;s value

Now, a direct comparison of the results from the two sources isn’t really possible at the moment (e.g. the number of participants varies by factor 10 between the two). Still, I think it&#039;s interesting how they offer quite substantially different pictures:

- Depending on what maturity stage an intranet is in, 7 to 28% of intranet managers rate their intranets as business critical in the &quot;Global Intranet Trends for 2010&quot;

- In contrast not a single intranet (0%) is rated as business critical from a user&#039;s perspective in the WIC

Likewise, at the other end of the spectrum, the ratings for an intranet’s value to be &quot;neutral or indifferent&quot; vary - but this time it&#039;s the other way around:

- 14 to 38% of the companies in the Global Intranet Trends (intranet manager&#039;s perspective)

- 0% of the companies in the WIC (user&#039;s perspective)

Quite extreme, huh? What does that mean for an organisation that wants to find out about the (qualitative) value of its intranet? One take away would surely be to always using a multi-faceted approach that includes all relevant stakeholder groups, from senior management to lines of business, to intranet teams to users.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s the article from LinkedIn &#8211; please not that a good discussion has evolved there so make you to go there as well:</p>
<p>Becoming business critical seems to be a generic strategic goal for many intranets. But who is to judge whether an intranet is business critical or not?</p>
<p>To my knowledge there are two sources of data that look into this topic:</p>
<p>- The &#8220;Global Intranet Trends&#8221; report by Jane McConnell: here the &#8220;Senior management perception&#8221; as judged by the participating intranet managers is investigated</p>
<p>- The Worldwide Intranet Challenge (WIC): here the intranet&#8217; users from the participating organisations are asked to state their perception of the intranet&#8217;s value</p>
<p>Now, a direct comparison of the results from the two sources isn’t really possible at the moment (e.g. the number of participants varies by factor 10 between the two). Still, I think it&#8217;s interesting how they offer quite substantially different pictures:</p>
<p>- Depending on what maturity stage an intranet is in, 7 to 28% of intranet managers rate their intranets as business critical in the &#8220;Global Intranet Trends for 2010&#8243;</p>
<p>- In contrast not a single intranet (0%) is rated as business critical from a user&#8217;s perspective in the WIC</p>
<p>Likewise, at the other end of the spectrum, the ratings for an intranet’s value to be &#8220;neutral or indifferent&#8221; vary &#8211; but this time it&#8217;s the other way around:</p>
<p>- 14 to 38% of the companies in the Global Intranet Trends (intranet manager&#8217;s perspective)</p>
<p>- 0% of the companies in the WIC (user&#8217;s perspective)</p>
<p>Quite extreme, huh? What does that mean for an organisation that wants to find out about the (qualitative) value of its intranet? One take away would surely be to always using a multi-faceted approach that includes all relevant stakeholder groups, from senior management to lines of business, to intranet teams to users.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Stephan Schillerwein</title>
		<link>http://intranet-matters.de/2009/12/04/do-intranet-managers-look-through-coloured-glasses-when-judging-their-intranets-impact-on-business/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Schillerwein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intranet-matters.de/?p=107#comment-376</guid>
		<description>If you are not a member yet, you can join the group here: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2289431&amp;trk=anetsrch_name&amp;goback=%2Egdr_1260544830582_2

(or get in touch and I&#039;ll send you an invite)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are not a member yet, you can join the group here: <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2289431&#038;trk=anetsrch_name&#038;goback=%2Egdr_1260544830582_2" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2289431&#038;trk=anetsrch_name&#038;goback=%2Egdr_1260544830582_2</a></p>
<p>(or get in touch and I&#8217;ll send you an invite)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Jane McConnell</title>
		<link>http://intranet-matters.de/2009/12/04/do-intranet-managers-look-through-coloured-glasses-when-judging-their-intranets-impact-on-business/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane McConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intranet-matters.de/?p=107#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Hi again, one more comment, Stephan: I was recently able to compare results from the WIC for an organization who also took part in my survey and the results coincided very well. Maybe just an &#039;aware&#039; intranet manager? 
Pls let me know how to read your article because I think the 2 surveys represent viewpoints that should not be so far apart....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again, one more comment, Stephan: I was recently able to compare results from the WIC for an organization who also took part in my survey and the results coincided very well. Maybe just an &#8216;aware&#8217; intranet manager?<br />
Pls let me know how to read your article because I think the 2 surveys represent viewpoints that should not be so far apart&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Jane McConnell</title>
		<link>http://intranet-matters.de/2009/12/04/do-intranet-managers-look-through-coloured-glasses-when-judging-their-intranets-impact-on-business/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane McConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intranet-matters.de/?p=107#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Hi Stephan
I&#039;d like to read your article but I can&#039;t since it says I&#039;m not a member of the group. What group do I need to join in order to read more?

Jane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephan<br />
I&#8217;d like to read your article but I can&#8217;t since it says I&#8217;m not a member of the group. What group do I need to join in order to read more?</p>
<p>Jane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

